The Promethean
Planet website provides several templates for use with Prometheus SMART Boards. The Who Wants to be a Millionaire Template is
engaging for students because they can actively manipulate the images projected
on the screen, whereas in a traditional classroom setting, students remain
confined to their desks (Roblyer & Doering, 2012, p. 147). Furthermore, Interactive whiteboard use in
the classroom can promote powerful learning.
Interactive whiteboards require two components: “hardware, or equipment,
and software, or programs, written to perform various functions” (Roblyer &
Doering, 2012, p. 11). Interactive
whiteboard activity software used in conjunction with interactive whiteboards
produce programs where teachers can create or modify templates, “in much the
same way as they would use PowerPoint’s program and resources to create slides”
(Roblyer & Doering, 2012, p. 147).
I would use the Who Wants to be a
Millionaire Template for review days.
Students would approach the board to select their answer, and because there
is a time-limit for each question, students could practice their
time-management testing skills. According
to Roblyer & Doering (2012), teachers face three questions when applying
technology use based on problem-solving: how to motivate and engage students, how
to support students’ learning needs, and how to prepare students for future
learning (p. 25-26)? Interactive
whiteboards successfully address each of these concerns by empowering the
student and rewarding them for participating.
Although Roblyer & Doering
(2012) declare that interactive whiteboards are growing in popularity, there
are essential conditions for technology integration in schools (p. 147). Administrators, teachers, and school
districts must share the same motivation and passion to equip students with
technological resources (Roblyer & Doering, 2012, p. 65). This includes, but is not limited to, the
fact that implementing such technology in the classroom would further support curriculum
concepts or skills (Roblyer & Doering, 2012, p. 66). Additionally, Roblyer & Doering (2012) suggest
that schools should adopt policies and an informed technical support team, even
if it requires teachers to attend development workshops (p. 68).
Of all the essential conditions for
technology integration in schools, funding poses the most significant challenge—especially
where the field of social studies is concerned.
Social studies is not a tested field; therefore, other core subjects are
more likely to receive funding for technology support. Social studies teachers assume the
responsibility of finding funding for their classrooms, often from outside
resources. When social studies teachers
emphasize the benefits of software support tools, such as interactive
whiteboards, their classroom is more likely to receive funding. Software support tools improve efficiency and
productivity, produce an attractive appearance, promote information accuracy,
and support collaboration and sharing among students (Roblyer & Doering,
2012, p. 140-141). Schools should
conduct wide-spread implementation of interactive whiteboards in the classroom,
but they must first construct a proper foundation to ensure that students experience
the highest-level of benefits from these tools.
References
Roblyer, M.D. & Doering, A.H. (2012). Integrating
educational technology into teaching (6th ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill Prentice
Hall.